Competition from other regions is intensifying and the EU has over time lost ground to the US and China, which are investing heavily in research, production and data-driven health innovation. There is now an urgent need for action to strengthen Europe’s competitiveness, states the organizations.

The new strategy must focus on concrete reforms.

“The EU has a choice to make. Either we act and secure Europe’s position as a leading region for research and innovation, or we watch as others take the lead. The new strategy must focus on concrete reforms. Better incentives for innovation, regulatory simplification and a more coordinated view of production, trade and sustainability,” says Sofia Wallström, CEO of Lif.

Sofia Wallström, CEO, Lif, Jessica Martinsson, CEO, SwedenBIO, Jonas Hagelqvist, CEO, IKEM, and Anna Lefevre Skjöldebrand, CEO, Swedish Medtech.

A life science office in Brussels

The main recommendation raised by the four actors is the establishment of a life science office in Brussels to coordinate work across all EU authorities and entities working on issues that directly or indirectly affect the life science industry.

The Swedish government’s life science office is highlighted as a successful example.

Regulatory simplification

The stakeholders highlight regulatory simplification as another high-priority recommendation and call on the EU to ensure that all proposals are accompanied by impact assessments to ensure that policies promote innovation rather than hinder it.

“Revisions to the Medical Devices Regulation and the In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation are needed. This requires regular consultations with the industry to be formalized,” says Anna Lefevre Skjöldebrand, CEO, Swedish Medtech.

A more balanced legislation, which combines innovation, competitiveness, safety, and sustainability, is crucial for Europe’s innovation capacity and for a strong ecosystem in life sciences.

For legislation to truly contribute to a competitive and innovative Europe, the organizations emphasize the importance of a new approach.

“We need a new approach where legislation weighs industrial and societal benefits against risks. A more balanced legislation, which combines innovation, competitiveness, safety, and sustainability, is crucial for Europe’s innovation capacity and for a strong ecosystem in life sciences,” says Jonas Hagelqvist, CEO, IKEM.

A binding EU body responsible for approving multinational clinical trials

Another proposal concerns clinical trials. Although the EU has taken steps in the right direction, challenges remain for those wishing to conduct multinational clinical trials. To simplify the process, the four actors propose the establishment of a binding EU body responsible for approving multinational clinical trials.

Related article

New clinical trial map launched in the EU

A new clinical trial map is now accessible from the public website of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


“The strategy should promote effective coordination between national ethical review boards and regulatory authorities, as well as establish an EU body with a binding mandate to approve multinational clinical trials – this will significantly simplify and accelerate the start of trials throughout Europe,” says Jessica Martinsson, CEO, SwedenBIO.

Related article

US market tariffs: Impact on the life science industry

At a White House press event on Wednesday April 2, President Trump advanced the next stage of his economic plan by unveiling baseline tariffs of 10% on the vast majority of goods imported to the US. After several years of increasing export figures, Sweden’s pharmaceutical exports now risk being severely affected by the Trump administration’s tariffs, warns the industry association SwedenBIO.


The report covers many issues affecting the life science industry with concrete solutions that the European Commission is urged to include in its upcoming strategy. The joint input paper has been submitted to the EU Commission, Swedish decision-makers and other relevant actors within the EU institutions.